Part of the SI MedEd family:MedEd PortalSI Med SchoolSI USMLESI Step 1SI Step 2 CKLCME Hub

What scores actually meant for the Match.

The NRMP's Charting Outcomes in the Match 2024 reports observed match rates by Step 2 CK score band for U.S. MD seniors. This page summarizes that public data — read the caveats first, then the numbers.

The national picture

One score, widely separated outcomes

In the 2024 Main Residency Match, matched U.S. MD seniors had a mean Step 2 CK score of 250.4 (SD 13.2). The overall U.S. MD senior PGY-1 match rate was 93.5% in both 2024 and the 2025 Match (20,368 active U.S. MD seniors; placement including SOAP 97.8%) — and the U.S. MD senior match rate has held in the 92–95% range since 1982 (source: NRMP, 2025 Main Residency Match results). The aggregate is reassuring; the specialty-level picture is where score bands separate.

Program directors confirmed the exam's weight in the 2024 NRMP Program Director Survey: the Step 2 CK score was the 4th most frequently considered factor when deciding whom to interview, 30% of programs required MD applicants to hit a target Step 2 CK score for an interview (36% for IMGs, 22% for DOs), and 77% consider failed Step attempts when interviewing (via ama-assn.org and ama-assn.org).

Read the caveats — they are the page

  • Population: U.S. MD seniors in the 2024 Main Residency Match who consented to research use (16,054 of 19,755 who submitted rank lists). Step 2 CK scores available for 98.4%; ~85% of scores school-verified.
  • "Match" means matched to the preferred specialty — the specialty of the applicant's first-ranked program — not matched anywhere.
  • These are observed match rates per score band (matched ÷ [matched + unmatched] within the band), extracted from the report's per-specialty distribution charts. They are not predicted probabilities for any individual, and they are not the report's logistic-regression probability curves (those use pooled 2022–2024 data and are published as graphs only — curve values aren't extractable).
  • Bands with small n are directional only. Cells marked † have fewer than 20 people in the band; treat those percentages as noise-prone.
  • Overall specialty rates are the report's official Chart 3 "percent matched by preferred specialty."
  • No 2026 edition exists yet (biennial series; the next edition covering the 2026 Match was not published as of 2026-09-30).

Five specialties, six score bands

Observed match % by Step 2 CK score band (2024 Match, U.S. MD seniors)

Five representative specialties — from less score-sensitive to highly score-sensitive — showing the observed percentage of applicants in each Step 2 CK score band who matched to their preferred specialty, with the band's sample size in parentheses. Scroll sideways on mobile.

Score band Pediatrics
overall 99.7%
Internal Medicine
overall 97.8%
General Surgery
overall 81.8%
Orthopaedic Surgery
overall 73.1%
Dermatology
overall 70.5%
211–220 97.0% (33) 82.3% (62) 23.8% (21) 0.0% (7)† 37.5% (8)†
221–230 100% (124) 91.1% (214) 42.9% (70) 27.3% (22) 28.6% (14)†
231–240 100% (208) 97.3% (409) 64.5% (155) 47.4% (78) 60.0% (30)
241–250 99.7% (304) 98.6% (714) 85.9% (227) 65.2% (178) 65.9% (88)
251–260 100% (308) 99.4% (808) 92.6% (296) 80.4% (235) 71.5% (137)
>260 100% (219) 99.5% (828) 94.9% (256) 89.9% (257) 82.3% (158)

† Fewer than 20 people in the band — directional only. "Overall" = the report's official Chart 3 percent matched to preferred specialty. Percentages are observed within-band match rates, not predicted probabilities.

Reading the patterns

What the table is actually saying

This is data journalism, not advising. These are population-level observations from one match year. They cannot tell you your probability of matching — no one can, and be skeptical of anyone who claims to. The right use of this table is as context for a conversation with your school advisor, who can weigh it alongside your whole application. A low score band is never the whole story, and a high band is never a guarantee.

Sources

Where the numbers come from